Importing

import ReactTestUtils from 'react-dom/test-utils'; // ES6
var ReactTestUtils = require('react-dom/test-utils'); // ES5 with npm

Overview

ReactTestUtils makes it easy to test React components in the testing framework of your choice. At Facebook we use Jest for painless JavaScript testing. Learn how to get started with Jest through the Jest website’s React Tutorial.

Note:

We recommend using React Testing Library which is designed to enable and encourage writing tests that use your components as the end users do.

For React versions <= 16, the Enzyme library makes it easy to assert, manipulate, and traverse your React Components’ output.

• act()


• mockComponent()


• isElement()


• isElementOfType()


• isDOMComponent()


• isCompositeComponent()


• isCompositeComponentWithType()


• findAllInRenderedTree()


• scryRenderedDOMComponentsWithClass()


• findRenderedDOMComponentWithClass()


• scryRenderedDOMComponentsWithTag()


• findRenderedDOMComponentWithTag()


• scryRenderedComponentsWithType()


• findRenderedComponentWithType()


• renderIntoDocument()


• Simulate

Reference

act()

To prepare a component for assertions, wrap the code rendering it and performing updates inside an act() call. This makes your test run closer to how React works in the browser.

Note

If you use react-test-renderer , it also provides an act export that behaves the same way.

For example, let’s say we have this Counter component:

class Counter extends React.Component {
  constructor(props) {
    super(props);
    this.state = {count: 0};
    this.handleClick = this.handleClick.bind(this);
  }
  componentDidMount() {
    document.title = `You clicked ${this.state.count} times`;
  }
  componentDidUpdate() {
    document.title = `You clicked ${this.state.count} times`;
  }
  handleClick() {
    this.setState(state => ({
      count: state.count + 1,
    }));
  }
  render() {
    return (
      <div>
        <p>You clicked {this.state.count} times</p>
        <button onClick={this.handleClick}>
          Click me
        </button>
      </div>
    );
  }
}

Here is how we can test it:

import React from 'react';
import ReactDOM from 'react-dom/client';
import { act } from 'react-dom/test-utils';import Counter from './Counter';

let container;

beforeEach(() => {
  container = document.createElement('div');
  document.body.appendChild(container);
});

afterEach(() => {
  document.body.removeChild(container);
  container = null;
});

it('can render and update a counter', () => {
  // Test first render and componentDidMount
  act(() => {    ReactDOM.createRoot(container).render(<Counter />);  });  const button = container.querySelector('button');
  const label = container.querySelector('p');
  expect(label.textContent).toBe('You clicked 0 times');
  expect(document.title).toBe('You clicked 0 times');

  // Test second render and componentDidUpdate
  act(() => {    button.dispatchEvent(new MouseEvent('click', {bubbles: true}));  });  expect(label.textContent).toBe('You clicked 1 times');
  expect(document.title).toBe('You clicked 1 times');
});

• Don’t forget that dispatching DOM events only works when the DOM container is added to the document . You can use a library like React Testing Library to reduce the boilerplate code.


• The recipes document contains more details on how act() behaves, with examples and usage.

mockComponent()

mockComponent(
  componentClass,
  [mockTagName]
)

Pass a mocked component module to this method to augment it with useful methods that allow it to be used as a dummy React component. Instead of rendering as usual, the component will become a simple <div> (or other tag if mockTagName is provided) containing any provided children.

Note:

mockComponent() is a legacy API. We recommend using jest.mock() instead.

isElement()

isElement(element)

Returns true if element is any React element.

isElementOfType()

isElementOfType(
  element,
  componentClass
)

Returns true if element is a React element whose type is of a React componentClass .

isDOMComponent()

isDOMComponent(instance)

Returns true if instance is a DOM component (such as a <div> or <span> ).

isCompositeComponent()

isCompositeComponent(instance)

Returns true if instance is a user-defined component, such as a class or a function.

isCompositeComponentWithType()

isCompositeComponentWithType(
  instance,
  componentClass
)

Returns true if instance is a component whose type is of a React componentClass .

findAllInRenderedTree()

findAllInRenderedTree(
  tree,
  test
)

Traverse all components in tree and accumulate all components where test(component) is true . This is not that useful on its own, but it’s used as a primitive for other test utils.

scryRenderedDOMComponentsWithClass()

scryRenderedDOMComponentsWithClass(
  tree,
  className
)

Finds all DOM elements of components in the rendered tree that are DOM components with the class name matching className .

findRenderedDOMComponentWithClass()

findRenderedDOMComponentWithClass(
  tree,
  className
)

Like scryRenderedDOMComponentsWithClass() but expects there to be one result, and returns that one result, or throws exception if there is any other number of matches besides one.

scryRenderedDOMComponentsWithTag()

scryRenderedDOMComponentsWithTag(
  tree,
  tagName
)

Finds all DOM elements of components in the rendered tree that are DOM components with the tag name matching tagName .

findRenderedDOMComponentWithTag()

findRenderedDOMComponentWithTag(
  tree,
  tagName
)

Like scryRenderedDOMComponentsWithTag() but expects there to be one result, and returns that one result, or throws exception if there is any other number of matches besides one.

scryRenderedComponentsWithType()

scryRenderedComponentsWithType(
  tree,
  componentClass
)

Finds all instances of components with type equal to componentClass .

findRenderedComponentWithType()

findRenderedComponentWithType(
  tree,
  componentClass
)

Same as scryRenderedComponentsWithType() but expects there to be one result and returns that one result, or throws exception if there is any other number of matches besides one.

renderIntoDocument()

renderIntoDocument(element)

Render a React element into a detached DOM node in the document. This function requires a DOM. It is effectively equivalent to:

const domContainer = document.createElement('div');
ReactDOM.createRoot(domContainer).render(element);

Note:

You will need to have window , window.document and window.document.createElement globally available before you import React . Otherwise React will think it can’t access the DOM and methods like setState won’t work.

Other Utilities

Simulate

Simulate.{eventName}(
  element,
  [eventData]
)

Simulate an event dispatch on a DOM node with optional eventData event data.

Simulate has a method for every event that React understands.

Clicking an element

// <button ref={(node) => this.button = node}>...</button>
const node = this.button;
ReactTestUtils.Simulate.click(node);

Changing the value of an input field and then pressing ENTER.

// <input ref={(node) => this.textInput = node} />
const node = this.textInput;
node.value = 'giraffe';
ReactTestUtils.Simulate.change(node);
ReactTestUtils.Simulate.keyDown(node, {key: "Enter", keyCode: 13, which: 13});

Note

You will have to provide any event property that you’re using in your component (e.g. keyCode, which, etc…) as React is not creating any of these for you.

Importing

import TestRenderer from 'react-test-renderer'; // ES6
const TestRenderer = require('react-test-renderer'); // ES5 with npm

Overview

This package provides a React renderer that can be used to render React components to pure JavaScript objects, without depending on the DOM or a native mobile environment.

Essentially, this package makes it easy to grab a snapshot of the platform view hierarchy (similar to a DOM tree) rendered by a React DOM or React Native component without using a browser or jsdom.

Example:

import TestRenderer from 'react-test-renderer';

function Link(props) {
  return <a href={props.page}>{props.children}</a>;
}

const testRenderer = TestRenderer.create(
  <Link page="https://www.facebook.com/">Facebook</Link>
);

console.log(testRenderer.toJSON());
// { type: 'a',
//   props: { href: 'https://www.facebook.com/' },
//   children: [ 'Facebook' ] }

You can use Jest’s snapshot testing feature to automatically save a copy of the JSON tree to a file and check in your tests that it hasn’t changed: Learn more about it.

You can also traverse the output to find specific nodes and make assertions about them.

import TestRenderer from 'react-test-renderer';

function MyComponent() {
  return (
    <div>
      <SubComponent foo="bar" />
      <p className="my">Hello</p>
    </div>
  )
}

function SubComponent() {
  return (
    <p className="sub">Sub</p>
  );
}

const testRenderer = TestRenderer.create(<MyComponent />);
const testInstance = testRenderer.root;

expect(testInstance.findByType(SubComponent).props.foo).toBe('bar');
expect(testInstance.findByProps({className: "sub"}).children).toEqual(['Sub']);

TestRenderer

• TestRenderer.create()


• TestRenderer.act()

TestRenderer instance

• testRenderer.toJSON()


• testRenderer.toTree()


• testRenderer.update()


• testRenderer.unmount()


• testRenderer.getInstance()


• testRenderer.root

TestInstance

• testInstance.find()


• testInstance.findByType()


• testInstance.findByProps()


• testInstance.findAll()


• testInstance.findAllByType()


• testInstance.findAllByProps()


• testInstance.instance


• testInstance.type


• testInstance.props


• testInstance.parent


• testInstance.children

Reference

TestRenderer.create()

TestRenderer.create(element, options);

Create a TestRenderer instance with the passed React element. It doesn’t use the real DOM, but it still fully renders the component tree into memory so you can make assertions about it. Returns a TestRenderer instance.

TestRenderer.act()

TestRenderer.act(callback);

Similar to the act() helper from react-dom/test-utils , TestRenderer.act prepares a component for assertions. Use this version of act() to wrap calls to TestRenderer.create and testRenderer.update .

import {create, act} from 'react-test-renderer';
import App from './app.js'; // The component being tested

// render the component
let root; 
act(() => {
  root = create(<App value={1}/>)
});

// make assertions on root 
expect(root.toJSON()).toMatchSnapshot();

// update with some different props
act(() => {
  root.update(<App value={2}/>);
})

// make assertions on root 
expect(root.toJSON()).toMatchSnapshot();

testRenderer.toJSON()

testRenderer.toJSON()

Return an object representing the rendered tree. This tree only contains the platform-specific nodes like <div> or <View> and their props, but doesn’t contain any user-written components. This is handy for snapshot testing.

testRenderer.toTree()

testRenderer.toTree()

Return an object representing the rendered tree. The representation is more detailed than the one provided by toJSON() , and includes the user-written components. You probably don’t need this method unless you’re writing your own assertion library on top of the test renderer.

testRenderer.update()

testRenderer.update(element)

Re-render the in-memory tree with a new root element. This simulates a React update at the root. If the new element has the same type and key as the previous element, the tree will be updated; otherwise, it will re-mount a new tree.

testRenderer.unmount()

testRenderer.unmount()

Unmount the in-memory tree, triggering the appropriate lifecycle events.

testRenderer.getInstance()

testRenderer.getInstance()

Return the instance corresponding to the root element, if available. This will not work if the root element is a function component because they don’t have instances.

testRenderer.root

testRenderer.root

Returns the root “test instance” object that is useful for making assertions about specific nodes in the tree. You can use it to find other “test instances” deeper below.

testInstance.find()

testInstance.find(test)

Find a single descendant test instance for which test(testInstance) returns true . If test(testInstance) does not return true for exactly one test instance, it will throw an error.

testInstance.findByType()

testInstance.findByType(type)

Find a single descendant test instance with the provided type . If there is not exactly one test instance with the provided type , it will throw an error.

testInstance.findByProps()

testInstance.findByProps(props)

Find a single descendant test instance with the provided props . If there is not exactly one test instance with the provided props , it will throw an error.

testInstance.findAll()

testInstance.findAll(test)

Find all descendant test instances for which test(testInstance) returns true .

testInstance.findAllByType()

testInstance.findAllByType(type)

Find all descendant test instances with the provided type .

testInstance.findAllByProps()

testInstance.findAllByProps(props)

Find all descendant test instances with the provided props .

testInstance.instance

testInstance.instance

The component instance corresponding to this test instance. It is only available for class components, as function components don’t have instances. It matches the this value inside the given component.

testInstance.type

testInstance.type

The component type corresponding to this test instance. For example, a <Button /> component has a type of Button .

testInstance.props

testInstance.props

The props corresponding to this test instance. For example, a <Button size="small" /> component has {size: 'small'} as props.

testInstance.parent

testInstance.parent

The parent test instance of this test instance.

testInstance.children

testInstance.children

The children test instances of this test instance.

Ideas

You can pass createNodeMock function to TestRenderer.create as the option, which allows for custom mock refs.
createNodeMock accepts the current element and should return a mock ref object.
This is useful when you test a component that relies on refs.

import TestRenderer from 'react-test-renderer';

class MyComponent extends React.Component {
  constructor(props) {
    super(props);
    this.input = null;
  }
  componentDidMount() {
    this.input.focus();
  }
  render() {
    return <input type="text" ref={el => this.input = el} />
  }
}

let focused = false;
TestRenderer.create(
  <MyComponent />,
  {
    createNodeMock: (element) => {
      if (element.type === 'input') {
        // mock a focus function
        return {
          focus: () => {
            focused = true;
          }
        };
      }
      return null;
    }
  }
);
expect(focused).toBe(true);

React 18 supports all modern browsers (Edge, Firefox, Chrome, Safari, etc).

If you support older browsers and devices such as Internet Explorer which do not provide modern browser features natively or have non-compliant implementations, consider including a global polyfill in your bundled application.

Here is a list of the modern features React 18 uses:

• Promise


• Symbol


• Object.assign

The correct polyfill for these features depend on your environment. For many users, you can configure your Browserlist settings. For others, you may need to import polyfills like core-js directly.

Single-page Application

A single-page application is an application that loads a single HTML page and all the necessary assets (such as JavaScript and CSS) required for the application to run. Any interactions with the page or subsequent pages do not require a round trip to the server which means the page is not reloaded.

Though you may build a single-page application in React, it is not a requirement. React can also be used for enhancing small parts of existing websites with additional interactivity. Code written in React can coexist peacefully with markup rendered on the server by something like PHP, or with other client-side libraries. In fact, this is exactly how React is being used at Facebook.

ES6, ES2015, ES2016, etc

These acronyms all refer to the most recent versions of the ECMAScript Language Specification standard, which the JavaScript language is an implementation of. The ES6 version (also known as ES2015) includes many additions to the previous versions such as: arrow functions, classes, template literals, let and const statements. You can learn more about specific versions here.

Compilers

A JavaScript compiler takes JavaScript code, transforms it and returns JavaScript code in a different format. The most common use case is to take ES6 syntax and transform it into syntax that older browsers are capable of interpreting. Babel is the compiler most commonly used with React.

Bundlers

Bundlers take JavaScript and CSS code written as separate modules (often hundreds of them), and combine them together into a few files better optimized for the browsers. Some bundlers commonly used in React applications include Webpack and Browserify.

Package Managers

Package managers are tools that allow you to manage dependencies in your project. npm and Yarn are two package managers commonly used in React applications. Both of them are clients for the same npm package registry.

CDN

CDN stands for Content Delivery Network. CDNs deliver cached, static content from a network of servers across the globe.

JSX

JSX is a syntax extension to JavaScript. It is similar to a template language, but it has full power of JavaScript. JSX gets compiled to React.createElement() calls which return plain JavaScript objects called “React elements”. To get a basic introduction to JSX see the docs here and find a more in-depth tutorial on JSX here.

React DOM uses camelCase property naming convention instead of HTML attribute names. For example, tabindex becomes tabIndex in JSX. The attribute class is also written as className since class is a reserved word in JavaScript:

<h1 className="hello">My name is Clementine!</h1>

Elements

React elements are the building blocks of React applications. One might confuse elements with a more widely known concept of “components”. An element describes what you want to see on the screen. React elements are immutable.

const element = <h1>Hello, world</h1>;

Typically, elements are not used directly, but get returned from components.

Components

React components are small, reusable pieces of code that return a React element to be rendered to the page. The simplest version of React component is a plain JavaScript function that returns a React element:

function Welcome(props) {
  return <h1>Hello, {props.name}</h1>;
}

Components can also be ES6 classes:

class Welcome extends React.Component {
  render() {
    return <h1>Hello, {this.props.name}</h1>;
  }
}

Components can be broken down into distinct pieces of functionality and used within other components. Components can return other components, arrays, strings and numbers. A good rule of thumb is that if a part of your UI is used several times (Button, Panel, Avatar), or is complex enough on its own (App, FeedStory, Comment), it is a good candidate to be a reusable component. Component names should also always start with a capital letter ( <Wrapper/> not <wrapper/> ). See this documentation for more information on rendering components.

props

props are inputs to a React component. They are data passed down from a parent component to a child component.

Remember that props are readonly. They should not be modified in any way:

// Wrong!
props.number = 42;

If you need to modify some value in response to user input or a network response, use state instead.

props.children

props.children is available on every component. It contains the content between the opening and closing tags of a component. For example:

<Welcome>Hello world!</Welcome>

The string Hello world! is available in props.children in the Welcome component:

function Welcome(props) {
  return <p>{props.children}</p>;
}

For components defined as classes, use this.props.children :

class Welcome extends React.Component {
  render() {
    return <p>{this.props.children}</p>;
  }
}

state

A component needs state when some data associated with it changes over time. For example, a Checkbox component might need isChecked in its state, and a NewsFeed component might want to keep track of fetchedPosts in its state.

The most important difference between state and props is that props are passed from a parent component, but state is managed by the component itself. A component cannot change its props , but it can change its state .

For each particular piece of changing data, there should be just one component that “owns” it in its state. Don’t try to synchronize states of two different components. Instead, lift it up to their closest shared ancestor, and pass it down as props to both of them.

Lifecycle Methods

Lifecycle methods are custom functionality that gets executed during the different phases of a component. There are methods available when the component gets created and inserted into the DOM (mounting), when the component updates, and when the component gets unmounted or removed from the DOM.

Controlled vs. Uncontrolled Components

React has two different approaches to dealing with form inputs.

An input form element whose value is controlled by React is called a controlled component . When a user enters data into a controlled component a change event handler is triggered and your code decides whether the input is valid (by re-rendering with the updated value). If you do not re-render then the form element will remain unchanged.

An uncontrolled component works like form elements do outside of React. When a user inputs data into a form field (an input box, dropdown, etc) the updated information is reflected without React needing to do anything. However, this also means that you can’t force the field to have a certain value.

In most cases you should use controlled components.

Keys

A “key” is a special string attribute you need to include when creating arrays of elements. Keys help React identify which items have changed, are added, or are removed. Keys should be given to the elements inside an array to give the elements a stable identity.

Keys only need to be unique among sibling elements in the same array. They don’t need to be unique across the whole application or even a single component.

Don’t pass something like Math.random() to keys. It is important that keys have a “stable identity” across re-renders so that React can determine when items are added, removed, or re-ordered. Ideally, keys should correspond to unique and stable identifiers coming from your data, such as post.id .

Refs

React supports a special attribute that you can attach to any component. The ref attribute can be an object created by React.createRef() function or a callback function, or a string (in legacy API). When the ref attribute is a callback function, the function receives the underlying DOM element or class instance (depending on the type of element) as its argument. This allows you to have direct access to the DOM element or component instance.

Use refs sparingly. If you find yourself often using refs to “make things happen” in your app, consider getting more familiar with top-down data flow.

Events

Handling events with React elements has some syntactic differences:

• React event handlers are named using camelCase, rather than lowercase.


• With JSX you pass a function as the event handler, rather than a string.

Reconciliation

When a component’s props or state change, React decides whether an actual DOM update is necessary by comparing the newly returned element with the previously rendered one. When they are not equal, React will update the DOM. This process is called “reconciliation”.

Hooks are a new addition in React 16.8. They let you use state and other React features without writing a class.

import React, { useState } from 'react';

function Example() {
  // Declare a new state variable, which we'll call "count"  const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
  return (
    <div>
      <p>You clicked {count} times</p>
      <button onClick={() => setCount(count + 1)}>
        Click me
      </button>
    </div>
  );
}

This new function useState is the first “Hook” we’ll learn about, but this example is just a teaser. Don’t worry if it doesn’t make sense yet!

You can start learning Hooks on the next page. On this page, we’ll continue by explaining why we’re adding Hooks to React and how they can help you write great applications.

Note

React 16.8.0 is the first release to support Hooks. When upgrading, don’t forget to update all packages, including React DOM.
React Native has supported Hooks since the 0.59 release of React Native.

Video Introduction

At React Conf 2018, Sophie Alpert and Dan Abramov introduced Hooks, followed by Ryan Florence demonstrating how to refactor an application to use them. Watch the video here:

No Breaking Changes

Before we continue, note that Hooks are:

• Completely opt-in. You can try Hooks in a few components without rewriting any existing code. But you don’t have to learn or use Hooks right now if you don’t want to.


• 100% backwards-compatible. Hooks don’t contain any breaking changes.


• Available now. Hooks are now available with the release of v16.8.0.

There are no plans to remove classes from React. You can read more about the gradual adoption strategy for Hooks in the bottom section of this page.

Hooks don’t replace your knowledge of React concepts. Instead, Hooks provide a more direct API to the React concepts you already know: props, state, context, refs, and lifecycle. As we will show later, Hooks also offer a new powerful way to combine them.

If you just want to start learning Hooks, feel free to jump directly to the next page! You can also keep reading this page to learn more about why we’re adding Hooks, and how we’re going to start using them without rewriting our applications.

Motivation

Hooks solve a wide variety of seemingly unconnected problems in React that we’ve encountered over five years of writing and maintaining tens of thousands of components. Whether you’re learning React, use it daily, or even prefer a different library with a similar component model, you might recognize some of these problems.

It’s hard to reuse stateful logic between components

React doesn’t offer a way to “attach” reusable behavior to a component (for example, connecting it to a store). If you’ve worked with React for a while, you may be familiar with patterns like render props and higher-order components that try to solve this. But these patterns require you to restructure your components when you use them, which can be cumbersome and make code harder to follow. If you look at a typical React application in React DevTools, you will likely find a “wrapper hell” of components surrounded by layers of providers, consumers, higher-order components, render props, and other abstractions. While we could filter them out in DevTools, this points to a deeper underlying problem: React needs a better primitive for sharing stateful logic.

With Hooks, you can extract stateful logic from a component so it can be tested independently and reused. Hooks allow you to reuse stateful logic without changing your component hierarchy. This makes it easy to share Hooks among many components or with the community.

We’ll discuss this more in Building Your Own Hooks.

Complex components become hard to understand

We’ve often had to maintain components that started out simple but grew into an unmanageable mess of stateful logic and side effects. Each lifecycle method often contains a mix of unrelated logic. For example, components might perform some data fetching in componentDidMount and componentDidUpdate . However, the same componentDidMount method might also contain some unrelated logic that sets up event listeners, with cleanup performed in componentWillUnmount . Mutually related code that changes together gets split apart, but completely unrelated code ends up combined in a single method. This makes it too easy to introduce bugs and inconsistencies.

In many cases it’s not possible to break these components into smaller ones because the stateful logic is all over the place. It’s also difficult to test them. This is one of the reasons many people prefer to combine React with a separate state management library. However, that often introduces too much abstraction, requires you to jump between different files, and makes reusing components more difficult.

To solve this, Hooks let you split one component into smaller functions based on what pieces are related (such as setting up a subscription or fetching data) , rather than forcing a split based on lifecycle methods. You may also opt into managing the component’s local state with a reducer to make it more predictable.

We’ll discuss this more in Using the Effect Hook.

Classes confuse both people and machines

In addition to making code reuse and code organization more difficult, we’ve found that classes can be a large barrier to learning React. You have to understand how this works in JavaScript, which is very different from how it works in most languages. You have to remember to bind the event handlers. Without ES2022 public class fields, the code is very verbose. People can understand props, state, and top-down data flow perfectly well but still struggle with classes. The distinction between function and class components in React and when to use each one leads to disagreements even between experienced React developers.

Additionally, React has been out for about five years, and we want to make sure it stays relevant in the next five years. As Svelte, Angular, Glimmer, and others show, ahead-of-time compilation of components has a lot of future potential. Especially if it’s not limited to templates. Recently, we’ve been experimenting with component folding using Prepack, and we’ve seen promising early results. However, we found that class components can encourage unintentional patterns that make these optimizations fall back to a slower path. Classes present issues for today’s tools, too. For example, classes don’t minify very well, and they make hot reloading flaky and unreliable. We want to present an API that makes it more likely for code to stay on the optimizable path.

To solve these problems, Hooks let you use more of React’s features without classes. Conceptually, React components have always been closer to functions. Hooks embrace functions, but without sacrificing the practical spirit of React. Hooks provide access to imperative escape hatches and don’t require you to learn complex functional or reactive programming techniques.

Examples

Hooks at a Glance is a good place to start learning Hooks.

Gradual Adoption Strategy

TLDR: There are no plans to remove classes from React.

We know that React developers are focused on shipping products and don’t have time to look into every new API that’s being released. Hooks are very new, and it might be better to wait for more examples and tutorials before considering learning or adopting them.

We also understand that the bar for adding a new primitive to React is extremely high. For curious readers, we have prepared a detailed RFC that dives into the motivation with more details, and provides extra perspective on the specific design decisions and related prior art.

Crucially, Hooks work side-by-side with existing code so you can adopt them gradually. There is no rush to migrate to Hooks. We recommend avoiding any “big rewrites”, especially for existing, complex class components. It takes a bit of a mind shift to start “thinking in Hooks”. In our experience, it’s best to practice using Hooks in new and non-critical components first, and ensure that everybody on your team feels comfortable with them. After you give Hooks a try, please feel free to send us feedback, positive or negative.

We intend for Hooks to cover all existing use cases for classes, but we will keep supporting class components for the foreseeable future. At Facebook, we have tens of thousands of components written as classes, and we have absolutely no plans to rewrite them. Instead, we are starting to use Hooks in the new code side by side with classes.

Frequently Asked Questions

We’ve prepared a Hooks FAQ page that answers the most common questions about Hooks.

Next Steps

By the end of this page, you should have a rough idea of what problems Hooks are solving, but many details are probably unclear. Don’t worry! Let’s now go to the next page where we start learning about Hooks by example.